arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Benchmarking Fine-tuning and Retrieval Strategies for a Multimodal Language Model on the NRC Reactor Operator Licensing Examination

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.22067 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]

Title:Benchmarking Fine-tuning and Retrieval Strategies for a Multimodal Language Model on the NRC Reactor Operator Licensing Examination

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Fine-tuning and Retrieval Strategies for a Multimodal Language Model on the NRC Reactor Operator Licensing Examination, by Isak Hwang and Yoon Pyo Lee
View PDF
Abstract:The integration of large language models (LLMs) into the nuclear power industry requires outputs grounded in domain-specific knowledge. This study evaluates a 31-billion-parameter open-weight multimodal model (Gemma 4 31B-IT) on its capacity to apply nuclear knowledge by benchmarking eight model-retrieval configurations against the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Reactor Operator licensing examination. We evaluate 14 Generic Fundamentals Examinations (GFE) from the 2015-2021 March sittings (seven pressurized and seven boiling water reactor exams) using the standard 80% human passing criterion. The base model is compared against configurations utilizing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on Gemini-distilled chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with BM25 sparse retrieval over the U.S. Department of Energy Fundamentals Handbook, and retrieval-augmented fine-tuning (RAFT). Within the retrieval pipeline, we compare fixed-size sliding-window chunking against structure-aware chunking. The SFT configuration with fixed-size chunking RAG met the criterion on 8 of the 14 examinations, outperforming all alternatives, whereas no configuration without fine-tuning passed any. Aggregate accuracy reached 79.7%, with a confidence interval spanning the threshold, and 80.2% on PWR items specifically. Furthermore, two regularities emerged: the preferred chunking strategy reverses depending on the model's training state, and RAFT underperforms compared to standard SFT in matching search environments. These results demonstrate which combination of fine-tuning and search approaches achieves operator-level capabilities.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.22067 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.22067v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22067
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: YoonPyo Lee [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:10:21 UTC (90 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Fine-tuning and Retrieval Strategies for a Multimodal Language Model on the NRC Reactor Operator Licensing Examination, by Isak Hwang and Yoon Pyo Lee
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language