Gait2Hip-60: A Unified Deep Learning Benchmark for Predicting Hip Muscle Forces and Joint Moments from Multi-Cadence Gait Kinematics
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Gait2Hip-60: A Unified Deep Learning Benchmark for Predicting Hip Muscle Forces and Joint Moments from Multi-Cadence Gait Kinematics
Abstract:Estimating hip muscle forces and joint moments during gait typically relies on musculoskeletal simulation, which is informative but time-consuming and difficult to apply in clinical settings. This study developed a deep learning framework to predict these hip dynamics parameters directly from lower-limb gait kinematics and compared three representative sequence models under a unified protocol. Gait data were collected from 60 healthy adults under three metronome-guided cadence conditions. Ten bilateral lower-limb joint angles were used as inputs, and OpenSim-derived hip muscle forces and hip joint moments were used as reference outputs. Three deep learning models of LSTM, Transformer, and Mamba were trained and evaluated using the same subject-level split, preprocessing pipeline, and metrics. The best model was then directly tested on an external cohort of 9 patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) without retraining. In the healthy-subject benchmark, Transformer achieved the best subject-level mean performance for both hip muscle force prediction (RMSE = 1.33 N/kg, MAE = 0.57 N/kg, R2 = 0.819) and hip joint moment prediction (RMSE = 0.11 Nm/kg, MAE = 0.07 Nm/kg, R2 = 0.862), with similar advantages across walking cadences. In zero-shot external validation, Transformer retained moderate predictive ability in ONFH for hip muscle force prediction (RMSE = 1.51 N/kg, MAE = 0.70 N/kg, R2 = 0.537) and hip joint moment prediction (RMSE = 0.17 Nm/kg, MAE = 0.12 Nm/kg, R2 = 0.569). These findings support the feasibility of estimating hip dynamics from gait kinematics, identify Transformer as a strong baseline, and highlight the need for broader pathological validation and improved generalization before clinical application.
| Comments: | 16 pages, 9 figures. Code and dataset publicly available |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.30374 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.30374v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.30374
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
QASM-Eval: A Dataset to Train and Evaluate LLMs on OpenQASM-3 Beyond Quantum Circuits
Jun 1
-
Unicorn: Scaling High-Dimensional Time Series Forecasting via Universal Correlation Modeling
Jun 1
-
When LLMs Learn to Be Consistently Wrong: A Multi-Model Study of Linear Representations of Synthetic Deception
Jun 1
-
LLMs Without Deep Neural Networks: New Architecture, Benefits and Case Study
Jun 1
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.