LLM Judges Inconsistently Disagree Across Safety Criteria and Harm Categories
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:LLM Judges Inconsistently Disagree Across Safety Criteria and Harm Categories
Abstract:We evaluate the consistency of automated judges in conducting a multi-dimensional safety evaluation in a reference-free setup. Our results indicate that Large Language Models are unreliable judges in identifying safety issues related to machine-generated advice in regulated domains such as finance, although they are more reliable at identifying more overt forms of unsafe/harmful content such as violence. The degree of inconsistency in a model's judgments can vary significantly by the chosen safety criteria and can be impacted by the language of the content and its linguistic style as well. Finally, there is high disagreement among different judges for the same output, across domains, safety criteria, and languages. These findings provide new insights on the practice of using LLMs as evaluators and offer several recommendations for practitioners on how to use automated judges in practical scenarios.
| Comments: | 8 pages plus appendices, under review |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.31381 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.31381v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31381
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Krishnapriya Vishnubhotla [view email][v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 14:50:08 UTC (1,534 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Protocol for evaluating ChatGPT in biomedical association generation and verification using a RAG-enabled, cross-model majority voting workflow
Jun 1
-
Exploring Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering for Model Specialization
Jun 1
-
Domain Adaptation and Reasoning Frameworks in Language Models: A Controlled Experiment with Historical Cosmology
Jun 1
-
Cross-Lingual Steering for Figurative Language Generation
Jun 1
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.