Hugging Face Daily Papers · · 4 min read

Training, learning and inference: unified dynamics of neural systems

Mirrored from Hugging Face Daily Papers for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

This work presents an experiment-first causal study of training, learning, inference, and feedback in realized neural networks. Across Transformer/Adam, ResNet/SGD momentum, and diffusion U-Net/AdamW systems, the same core relation structure is preserved: realized updates produce receiving-state-dependent nonlinear responses, learning persistently reorganizes distributed functional support, frozen inference recruits training-formed support, and feedback alters subsequent formation states. Only after completing these experiments and cross-system tests did I realize that I had experimentally demonstrated that neural networks are stateful dynamical systems. All protocols, experiments, independent checkers, and archived evidence are publicly available.</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-08-31T02:01:26.078Z","author":{"_id":"6a928285ec2a5768c8b90e78","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/FdGsPl6I-sDCbVUdtKWJG.png","fullname":"Mian Wang","name":"wind342","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.902256965637207},"editors":["wind342"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/FdGsPl6I-sDCbVUdtKWJG.png"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.20965","authors":[{"_id":"6a928528073195fee515659e","user":{"_id":"6a928285ec2a5768c8b90e78","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/FdGsPl6I-sDCbVUdtKWJG.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"Mian Wang","user":"wind342","type":"user","name":"wind342"},"name":"Mian Wang","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2026-08-29T08:45:04.249Z","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-08-21T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z","title":"Training, learning and inference: unified dynamics of neural systems","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"6a928285ec2a5768c8b90e78","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/FdGsPl6I-sDCbVUdtKWJG.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"Mian Wang","user":"wind342","type":"user","name":"wind342"},"summary":"We define an atomic generation fact f=(u,tau,omega,z;rho), recording the origin, realized transformation, concrete occurrence, generated result and relation role. Compiled into a Generation-Fact Graph (GFG), these facts provide an AI-native, compilable scientific fact substrate preserving generation histories. We establish a GFG-based recursive scientific process in which analysis, intervention, replay and validation form facts for later cycles. Using nanoGPT, we establish unified training-learning dynamics. Training is the evolution of a parameter-optimizer system with state and memory: each actual training action enters the receiving state and produces a finite-amplitude nonlinear functional response conditioned by that state and target-specific update geometry. Learning is the persistent reorganization of distributed functional support by these responses; capability formation, maintenance, decline or recovery becomes observable when target-specific states are evaluated against their readout boundaries. Three primary coordinates - target-boundary state, target-specific update geometry and parameter-Adam receiving state - yield a second-order predictor operating before post-update outputs are read. On held-out runs, it achieved 91.43% accuracy and 91.49% macro-averaged recall across four transitions. We further establish inference as a frozen projection of training-learning dynamics. Component gating and rollback show causal recruitment and non-additive combination of query-conditioned support formed during training, deriving organizational conditions realized by Attention. Controlled feedback indicates possible double-edged reinforcement effects. ResNet/CIFAR-100 and diffusion/CIFAR-10 experiments confirm receiving-state-conditioned responses, persistent support reorganization and frozen inference projection beyond nanoGPT.","upvotes":2,"discussionId":"6a928528073195fee515659f","githubRepo":"https://github.com/wind342/gfg-training-learning-inference-experiments","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"Atomic generation facts compiled into a graph enable recursive scientific processes, and training-learning dynamics in nanoGPT are characterized by state-conditioned parameter updates, persistent functional reorganization, and frozen inference projections validated across architectures.","ai_keywords":["atomic generation fact","Generation-Fact Graph","nanoGPT","parameter-optimizer system","target-specific update geometry","parameter-Adam receiving state","second-order predictor","inference projection","component gating","rollback","Attention","ResNet/CIFAR-100","diffusion/CIFAR-10"],"ai_summary_model":"thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small","githubStars":0},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7/g6EX7diOpuA94R2ab-rZC.png","isPro":true,"fullname":"Dipankar Sarkar","user":"dipankarsarkar","type":"user"},{"_id":"6a2da6c8ca070ee12c6e396c","avatarUrl":"/avatars/0355287dcabaa67dbc7f0b10b87451f9.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Joe Mama","user":"JoeMama123123123","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"query":{}}">
Papers
arxiv:2608.20965

Training, learning and inference: unified dynamics of neural systems

Published on Aug 21
· Submitted by
Mian Wang
on Aug 31
Authors:

Abstract

Atomic generation facts compiled into a graph enable recursive scientific processes, and training-learning dynamics in nanoGPT are characterized by state-conditioned parameter updates, persistent functional reorganization, and frozen inference projections validated across architectures.

We define an atomic generation fact f=(u,tau,omega,z;rho), recording the origin, realized transformation, concrete occurrence, generated result and relation role. Compiled into a Generation-Fact Graph (GFG), these facts provide an AI-native, compilable scientific fact substrate preserving generation histories. We establish a GFG-based recursive scientific process in which analysis, intervention, replay and validation form facts for later cycles. Using nanoGPT, we establish unified training-learning dynamics. Training is the evolution of a parameter-optimizer system with state and memory: each actual training action enters the receiving state and produces a finite-amplitude nonlinear functional response conditioned by that state and target-specific update geometry. Learning is the persistent reorganization of distributed functional support by these responses; capability formation, maintenance, decline or recovery becomes observable when target-specific states are evaluated against their readout boundaries. Three primary coordinates - target-boundary state, target-specific update geometry and parameter-Adam receiving state - yield a second-order predictor operating before post-update outputs are read. On held-out runs, it achieved 91.43% accuracy and 91.49% macro-averaged recall across four transitions. We further establish inference as a frozen projection of training-learning dynamics. Component gating and rollback show causal recruitment and non-additive combination of query-conditioned support formed during training, deriving organizational conditions realized by Attention. Controlled feedback indicates possible double-edged reinforcement effects. ResNet/CIFAR-100 and diffusion/CIFAR-10 experiments confirm receiving-state-conditioned responses, persistent support reorganization and frozen inference projection beyond nanoGPT.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter about 6 hours ago

This work presents an experiment-first causal study of training, learning, inference, and feedback in realized neural networks. Across Transformer/Adam, ResNet/SGD momentum, and diffusion U-Net/AdamW systems, the same core relation structure is preserved: realized updates produce receiving-state-dependent nonlinear responses, learning persistently reorganizes distributed functional support, frozen inference recruits training-formed support, and feedback alters subsequent formation states. Only after completing these experiments and cross-system tests did I realize that I had experimentally demonstrated that neural networks are stateful dynamical systems. All protocols, experiments, independent checkers, and archived evidence are publicly available.

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.20965 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.20965 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.20965 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from Hugging Face Daily Papers