Landmark-Based Discrimination of Injury-Associated Athlete-Sessions from Minute-Resolution Multimodal Football Monitoring Data
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2609.03790 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026]
Title:Landmark-Based Discrimination of Injury-Associated Athlete-Sessions from Minute-Resolution Multimodal Football Monitoring Data
View a PDF of the paper titled Landmark-Based Discrimination of Injury-Associated Athlete-Sessions from Minute-Resolution Multimodal Football Monitoring Data, by Evangelos Chatzidimitriou and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Athlete monitoring data may be recorded minute by minute throughout a match or training session, while injury information may only indicate whether the entire session was injury-associated.
This creates a modelling problem: assigning the same session-level label to every minute would imply that injury status is known at each exact time, even though within-session injury onset is unknown.
Our novelty is a fixed-landmark, one-representation-per-athlete-session formulation that directly addresses this mismatch. Instead of labelling every minute, we construct one representation per athlete-session at each landmark using information observed up to that point. This keeps the target at the session level and avoids unsupported minute-level injury supervision.
A landmark is a fixed time point within the same session, such as 10, 20, or 30 minutes. At each landmark, we assess whether the whole session is injury-associated or non-injury-associated and examine how discrimination changes as more within-session information becomes available.
Using 2020 SoccerMon data, we analyse 3,743 athlete-sessions from 48 elite women's football athletes, including 22 injury-associated sessions from five athletes. We evaluate pre-session, cumulative, dynamic, and combined representations with athlete-disjoint validation, athlete-cluster bootstrap uncertainty, common-cohort sensitivity analysis, alternative negative-athlete fold allocations, equal-athlete weighting, and Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost benchmarks.
Primary CUM+DYN Logistic Regression yields ROC-AUC 0.367-0.607 and PR-AUC 0.0080-0.0150 across landmarks, with wide uncertainty. PRE-containing representations show higher point estimates at several landmarks but remain uncertain.
| Comments: | 12 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.03790 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.03790v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03790
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Evangelos Chatzidimitriou [view email][v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 13:00:23 UTC (843 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Landmark-Based Discrimination of Injury-Associated Athlete-Sessions from Minute-Resolution Multimodal Football Monitoring Data, by Evangelos Chatzidimitriou and 1 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.