NeurIPS Reference Check Response[D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I have received the email for the NeurIPS E&D track reference review checker mentioning the 2 hallucinated references. Where do we respond to this email about hallucinated references? In the openreview, as a comment, or in the mail we have received, mentioning the hallucinated references?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
How can I turn an industry ML project into a publication? [R]
Sep 28
-
Are there any good research papers around Text clustering using LLMs [R]
Sep 28
-
Free, open-source AI engineering course where you build each algorithm by hand: 523 lessons, now as EPUB/PDF books [P]
Sep 28
-
Two-stage shelf audit: YOLO finds the products, embeddings can't tell sibling SKUS apart. What should Stage 2 be? [P]
Sep 27
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.