GrowLoop: Self-Evolving Conversation Evaluation Seeded by Human
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:GrowLoop: Self-Evolving Conversation Evaluation Seeded by Human
Abstract:With the rapid advancement of large language models, evaluating human-likeness in open-ended conversation has become increasingly important. However, human-likeness is a form of tacit knowledge that humans perceive intuitively, yet the underlying criteria resist explicit formulation. Human judgments vary widely, with strong agreement on some cases and legitimate disagreement on others. Meanwhile, the criteria behind human judgments remain implicit, leaving no clear basis for constructing cases. Further, what counts as human-like is not static, but evolving with model capability and human expectations. Despite progress in evaluation methods such as expert-authored benchmarks, Reward Models, and self-evolving benchmarks, none addresses all three challenges simultaneously. Therefore, we propose GrowLoop, a self-evolving conversation evaluation system that continuously adapts as models advance and scenarios shift. With minimal human seed annotations as the first mover, LLM agents iteratively extract and refine evaluation rubrics through Heuristic Learning. Human-AI agreement is required where annotators converge, while only plausibility is expected where they diverge. Moreover, the Rubric-Case co-evolution mechanism enables continuous evolution, expanded through new seeds when the evaluation target moves. Applied to human-likeness evaluation in open-ended conversation, the generated rubrics not only substantially outperform existing methods in alignment with human judgments, but also uncover issues that annotators overlook. The resulting benchmark effectively discriminates models across capability tiers and reveals where they fall short, while generalizing to new scenarios and adapting as models advance. Our work shifts the benchmarking paradigm from manual updates or difficulty scaling to comprehensive, continuous self-evolution.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.28882 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.28882v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28882
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Lightweight Multimodal LLM-Enabled Cost-Effective Defect Grading of Power Transmission Equipment
May 29
-
What are They Thinking? Delineation, Probing and Tracking of Concepts in LLMs
May 29
-
A Modular Architecture for Typologically Controlled Lexicon Generation
May 29
-
MechELK: A Mechanistic Interpretability Framework for Eliciting Latent Knowledge in Large Language Models
May 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.