arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

A Computational Comparison of Fourier Spectral Differentiation and Spatial Automatic Differentiation in Periodic Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.02110 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:A Computational Comparison of Fourier Spectral Differentiation and Spatial Automatic Differentiation in Periodic Physics-Informed Neural Networks

View a PDF of the paper titled A Computational Comparison of Fourier Spectral Differentiation and Spatial Automatic Differentiation in Periodic Physics-Informed Neural Networks, by Xilai Liang and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) commonly evaluate the spatial derivatives appearing in partial differential equation residuals using automatic differentiation (AD), whose computational and memory costs can become substantial when multiple or high-order derivatives are required. We perform a controlled comparison of spatial AD and Fourier spectral differentiation in periodic physical-space PINNs. Within each paired experiment, the neural representation, temporal differentiation, optimizer, sampling procedure, and training schedule are held fixed, so that the two cases differ only in the spatial differentiation procedure. For the Fourier variant, network outputs are evaluated on a uniform periodic grid and transformed to Fourier space, where spatial derivatives are obtained through spectral multiplication and the same Fourier coefficients are reused across derivative orders. We compare the two procedures in standard PINNs for the Allen--Cahn and Korteweg--de Vries equations and in Causal PINNs for the Allen--Cahn, Korteweg--de Vries, and Kuramoto--Sivashinsky equations. Across these five equation--framework settings, Fourier differentiation yields mean paired end-to-end training speedups ranging from $2.90\times$ to $18.52\times$ and reduces peak allocated graphics processing unit (GPU) memory by $68.7\%$--$94.1\%$. The final relative $L_2$ errors remain of the same order, with neither differentiation procedure showing a consistent accuracy advantage. For the one-dimensional periodic benchmarks considered here, Fourier spectral differentiation therefore provides substantially lower training time and memory usage than spatial AD while retaining comparable solution error, at the cost of requiring a uniform structured spatial grid.
Comments: 17 pages, 4 figures, 1 table
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.02110 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.02110v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02110
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Xilai Liang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 04:52:26 UTC (212 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Computational Comparison of Fourier Spectral Differentiation and Spatial Automatic Differentiation in Periodic Physics-Informed Neural Networks, by Xilai Liang and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning