A Theory of Conditional Collapse under Low-Rank Weight-Space Ablations: I. The Single-Block Theory and Synthetic Validation
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:A Theory of Conditional Collapse under Low-Rank Weight-Space Ablations: I. The Single-Block Theory and Synthetic Validation
Abstract:Activation patching and weight-space ablation both claim a component is causally responsible for a behavior, yet they act on different objects: one forward pass versus the parameters behind every forward pass. We ask when they agree.
We study an idealized model where a conditional computation is carried additively through a residual stream, $F(x)=F_0(x)+\sum_i\alpha_i(x)v_i$, read out by a linear functional, and prove three exact results. First, deleting a subset of carriers collapses a matched input pair onto the same unconditional output \emph{if and only if} the removal is symmetric on the pair and leaves no outside contrast; the error is deterministic, and we give its exact form even when the two conditions hold only approximately. Second, patching a carrier moves the readout by its donor-receiver \emph{contrast}, while ablating it moves the readout by its \emph{absolute level}; neither bounds the other, and we construct pairs where every single-carrier patch flips the decision while no single-carrier ablation does. Third, for an attention head composed with its own layer's normalization and MLP, we derive an exact first-order interaction formula with a provably second-order remainder, vanishing identically when only the MLP is ablated but not, in general, when a head is.
Small transformers trained on a synthetic conditional task illustrate all three predictions: across thirty-nine ablation configurations the measured interaction is strongly rank-correlated with the idealized model's predictive accuracy (Spearman $-0.83$), and a second task and architecture reproduces the same pattern, including a further polarity reversal.
The single-block interaction result extends past one residual block, and the synthetic validation is tested against a real pretrained model, in a companion paper that takes this theory further along both axes.
| Comments: | 25 pages, 2 figures. Part I of a two-part series; see the companion paper "Cross-Layer Interaction under Weight-Space Ablation" (Part II) |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.03620 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.03620v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03620
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
LoKiFormer: Locality-aware Attention with Decoupled Knowledge Memory for Efficient Large Language Model Pretraining
Aug 14
-
Which Site, and When: A Free-Satellite-Data Test of Himalayan Glacial Lake Bursts, Landslides, and Ice Floods
Aug 14
-
MARCH: Scaling Recurrent Memory with Content-Routed State Anchors
Aug 14
-
Multi-AUV Ad-hoc network-based Target Tracking: A Value Gradient Guidance Multi-Agent Diffusion Reinforcement Learning Approach
Aug 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.