Causal Machine Learning Is Not a Panacea: A Roadmap for Observational Causal Inference in Health
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2605.20782 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 May 2026]
Title:Causal Machine Learning Is Not a Panacea: A Roadmap for Observational Causal Inference in Health
Authors:Donna Tjandra (1), Trenton Chang (1), Sonali Parbhoo (2), Rajesh Ranganath (3 and 4), Andre Kurepa Waschka (5), William Mitchell (6), Maggie Makar (1), Shalmali Joshi (7), Finale Doshi-Velez (8), Leo Anthony Celi (9, 10, and 11), Jenna Wiens (1) ((1) Division of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, (2) Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK, (3) Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, New York, United States, (4) Center for Data Science, New York University, New York, New York, United States, (5) Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Elon University, Elon, North Carolina, United States, (6) Department of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK, (7) Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States, (8) School of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, (9) Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, (10) Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, (11) Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States)
View a PDF of the paper titled Causal Machine Learning Is Not a Panacea: A Roadmap for Observational Causal Inference in Health, by Donna Tjandra (1) and 65 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Objective: The growing availability of large-scale observational clinical datasets and challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials have spurred enthusiasm in using causal machine learning (ML) for causal inference in observational data. We present a roadmap for applying causal ML to observational data. Materials and methods: We outline the importance of assessing validity assumptions within available data and applying causal ML responsibly for clinical experts using causal ML and ML practitioners with limited clinical expertise. Observations: Despite advances in causal ML, its limitations remain largely under-appreciated across disciplines. This gap in shared knowledge may impact the validity of findings. Discussion: Causal assumptions must be satisfied and modeling choices justified. Otherwise, these approaches risk producing biased or misleading results, with consequences for clinical research and patient care. Conclusion: Causal ML can be a powerful tool for generating causal hypotheses. We provide a template to strengthen the rigor and interpretability of causal analyses.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20782 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20782v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20782
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
View a PDF of the paper titled Causal Machine Learning Is Not a Panacea: A Roadmap for Observational Causal Inference in Health, by Donna Tjandra (1) and 65 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Neural Estimation of Pairwise Mutual Information in Masked Discrete Sequence Models
May 21
-
GraphDiffMed: Knowledge-Constrained Differential Attention with Pharmacological Graph Priors for Medication Recommendation
May 21
-
TabPFN-MT: A Natively Multitask In-Context Learner for Tabular Data
May 21
-
Provably Learning Diffusion Models under the Manifold Hypothesis: Collapse and Refine
May 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.