Is Child-Directed Language Optimized for Word Learning? A Computational Study of Verb Meaning Acquisition
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
arXiv:2605.12047v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Is child-directed language (CDL) optimized to support language learning, and which aspects of linguistic development does it facilitate? We investigate this question using neural language models trained on CDL versus adult-directed language (ADL). We selectively remove syntactic or lexical co-occurrence information from the model training data, and evaluate the impact of these manipulations on verb meaning acquisition. While disrupting syntax impairs learning across all datasets, models trained on CDL and spoken ADL show significantly higher resilience than those trained on written input. Tracking semantic and syntactic performance over training, we observe a semantic-first trajectory, with verb meanings emerging prior to robust syntactic proficiency, an asynchrony most pronounced in the spoken domain, especially CDL. These results suggest that the advantage for verb learning previously attributed to CDL may instead reflect broader properties of the spoken register, rather than a uniquely CDL-specific optimization.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Sampling More, Getting Less: Calibration is the Diversity Bottleneck in LLMs
May 13
-
ClinicalBench: Stress-Testing Assertion-Aware Retrieval for Cross-Admission Clinical QA on MIMIC-IV
May 13
-
Decomposing Evolutionary Mixture-of-LoRA Architectures: The Routing Lever, the Lifecycle Penalty, and a Substrate-Conditional Boundary
May 13
-
The Bicameral Model: Bidirectional Hidden-State Coupling Between Parallel Language Models
May 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.