arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

When Should an AI Scientist Stop? Verifiable Experiment Steering and Refusal for Autonomous Discovery

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2606.07576 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]

Title:When Should an AI Scientist Stop? Verifiable Experiment Steering and Refusal for Autonomous Discovery

View a PDF of the paper titled When Should an AI Scientist Stop? Verifiable Experiment Steering and Refusal for Autonomous Discovery, by Neel Tushar Shah and Manglam Kartik
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We present CARTOGRAPH, a verification layer for AI scientists that couples unresolved-subspace experiment steering (select), explicit ambiguity closure (resolve), and residual-based library inadequacy detection (refuse). Under a local linear-Gaussian bridge, raw unresolved projection is the isotropic unresolved Fisher-information trace, while CARTOGRAPH-A is the exact unresolved A-optimal rule; closed-form EIG and Box-Hill arise as local comparators rather than global equivalents. Across five testbeds, CARTOGRAPH-A beats raw projection 129W/0T/15L at d = 8 (p < 10^-21) in a replicated structured cascade. More distinctively, the framework tentatively identifies three out-of-library pharmacokinetic mechanisms and then revokes those identifications as residuals expose structural misfit, while one perturbed in-library control stays identified throughout. In low-dimensional pharmacokinetic and filtered EPA settings, near-ties against disagreement are predicted by theory and observed. Finally, in a retrospective audit of 40 positive claims from the published A-Lab autonomous materials system, the refuse guard flags all 4 claims later marked inconclusive under manual reanalysis while passing 32/36 confirmed claims. Code is available at this https URL
Comments: Accepted at AI for Science Workshop at ICML 2026
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07576 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2606.07576v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07576
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Neel Tushar Shah [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 18:19:16 UTC (2,066 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled When Should an AI Scientist Stop? Verifiable Experiment Steering and Refusal for Autonomous Discovery, by Neel Tushar Shah and Manglam Kartik
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning